Our contradictory expectations of life and morality are not only entirely not Darwinian, they ultimately stem from a post-Christian sense of ‘hope’ clashing with pragmatism.
On the one hand, we see the survival of the fittest – the most despicable, ghoulishly evil and hard-nosed – and we wring our hands in feigned – or if you are under 20 – real horror.
And, guess what?
On the other hand, we all really fully accept this and are perfectly happy to sit and watch this dichotomy between ‘decency’ and the irresistible Law of the Jungle.
Might is indeed right beneath a veneer of altruism.
Even the snowiest snowflake dare not criticize a right wing monster for his legal promiscuity, drugs, drink or ‘honestly-earned’ wealth.
They can attack only his other hideous failings.
Even they want to be able to enjoy libertine liberalism.
They want the freedom to enjoy that very lifestyle – or at least to watch from the sidelines.
How can they attack him for his libertinism?
Consequences of Evolutionism on Criticism and Society
However this stops us criticizing those who represent the bracing hedonistic regime of the dying Caucasians’ childfree little world.
We must be silent lambs to the slaughter.
This a second consequence of evolution-ism.
We are reduced to brilliant animals who encourage others to be brilliant animals – all now busy committing ethnic suicide.
It really is now only a matter of time.
Birth control and commercial paganism have annihilated us.
Just come back in 80 years.
Two generations and the number of your clade – secular Caucasians – will be down to perhaps 300 million!
In all there are 1 billion Caucasians today.
So there may be 800 million religious Christian and other faith ‘whites’ but since 80% of Jews are today secular… Well, work it out.
80% of Jews will have 1 child for 4 people.
There are about 12 million non-haredi secular Jews today.
There will be 3 million in two generations.
OK – double it. 6 million.
Secular Judaism is three times more effective than the Germans were.
They managed to kill off one third of the world Jewish population.
We have got rid of half.
Yes, obviously you cannot compare …. But when push comes to shove – Bye!!
Demographic Shifts and Classifications
Now I chose ‘whites’ because Jews are all classified as whites and must be controlled by those statistics.
If you party and drink with people – you become classified with them.
Obviously, fortunately, the picture is very much the opposite for black, brown and Chinese races.
The secular will disappear but the majority religious will thrive.
Again, it is too obvious to state that our (or actually their) European world will be entirely controlled by Islam.
We cannot turn the vast sinking ocean-going liner around.
We must sink – drowning three quarters of us aboard.
The next liner will drown three quarters of those left. Fact.
Look it up – but AI softens the facts in line with its invisible censorship.
Darwinism’s Impact on Society and Adoration
So Darwinism is doubly the great hidden chasm which has swallowed the foundations of the Dis-United States and most of the First World.
Do we not lavish adoration and the greatest rewards on the most heinously greedy, selfish and murderous corrupt cannibals on the planet – politicians, corporate leaders, billionaires, media monkeys, celebrats.
We scrape and bow.
Their world is soulless and childless.
We dance behind them – cheering.
This is our dilemma.
We feel we need morality but mimic an empty one.
Despite Darwin, we try to embody the best of modern ‘morality’ and the expectations of decent folk.
But – even after we have re-thought them – our up-bringing and cultural milieu have given us inappropriate subconscious responses to the ‘real world’.
We, the decent folk, all want to do good but not at the expense of being good.
Evolution of Moral Terms Over Time
So we have (or had) ‘woke’ and before that ‘politically correct’ and before that ‘committed’ which followed ‘engaged’ replacing perhaps ‘conscious’ and ‘aware’ in the 1980s.
Now the newest kids on the bloke are ‘positionality’, ‘equity-focused’ and ‘intersectionality’.
Whining, wingeing secular Jews would add ‘anti-Zionist’ and anti-Semitic are also appropriate adjectives for the liberal movement.
This is utterly ridiculous.
If you were not Jewish what would you think about Israel, and Jews??
So what of your personal morality?!
Bribed by smoke salmon and bagels – or turned into a Jewish anti-Zionist anti-Semite by them??
I need not continue – morality was always a fiction.
Why? Because it has no irremovable guidelines.
Morality is usually guided by emotion and self interest.
Rejection of Christianity and Unrealistic Expectations
Thus, today, we easily reject Christianity but never its equally unrealistic lesson – the expectation of – somehow or other – temporal rewards for being ‘good’ and just, happy endings.
Western Europeans have upheld such noble principles and beliefs for centuries.
Then we began to see that those embodying them revelled in brazen hypocrisy and disobedience, and that very few endings are satisfying.
We wept, ‘It’s not fair!’
Therefore, we saw that the Deity simply cannot exist.
We all see, at every turn that everything which He is meant to rule, breaks His laws.
Man eats man; cruelty, horror, unimaginable pain are the norms in a world created in loving-kindness??
Consequently evolution seems so true to life.
Contrast with Real Judaism’s View
We have discussed that this cosy post-Christian vista of ‘good’ resolutions and the vindication of the decent man is a world away from Real Judaism’s view.
It results from a millennium of well-meaning misinformation.
People want immediate and palpable rewards.
Be a good Christian and you will be saved in this as well as in the next world.
This grew into a public campaign from about 950, as public sermons and Christian mummeries, mystery plays and morality dramas were permitted and spread rapidly, inoculating the masses with these expectations.
Roots in Drama and Literature
Our drama and literature have their roots in these earliest plays.
These were the only form of formal entertainment for many centuries throughout medieval Europe.
In every market place and on every festival crowds thronged to watch and be enthralled.
They were repeatedly taught that if you did right you would be rewarded.
Adding the subtlety that your reward was only to be in a World to Come would scarcely have appealed to a populace that needed concrete and ocular proof.
So, the strolling players’ heroes and saints received their just rewards on stage in this world.
We have mentioned the false world of chivalry created by the early historians, in which the white knight in shining armour on the white steed wins through.
This Arthurian world was merely a blending of solid Christian teaching with ancient pagan British myths.
This was continued by Chaucer, Shakespeare and their ilk, and then translated later, through the Romance and Romantics, into an a-religious but powerful message to which we still subscribe.
Today’s entertainment media has politically corrected the noble white warrior and s/he has been of course de-raced and ‘feminised’, but the hero/ine still must win.
Everyone knows that the sombre reality is nothing like this; but we are still brainwashed to hope.
Influence of Entertainment and Media
This is why people are happy to be saturated by the world of entertainment.
It reinforces this subconscious need.
Sporting ‘heroes’ replaced the noble knight, and the US military has become the whiter than white protector – not of capitalism – but of a vaguely defined Christendom confronted with Islam.
Consider the press’s wrath against soldiers or sportsmen who break the code.
We are still clinging to medieval literature’s values as rooted in Beowulf, Wace’s Round Table, ‘Gawain and the Green Knight’ or indeed ‘The Knight’s Tale’.
It is necessary to note that this entire Christian culture produced some of the greatest good in the history of Mankind.
The tolerance, generosity and decency of the ideal First World post-Christian underpins our disintegrating universe.
I am alive only because of it.
Modern World’s Unrealistic Moral Expectancy
But the central point is that our modern world remains blinkered by an a-religious but Christian moral expectancy which is drastically unrealistic.
This is another subconscious, if indirect, consequence of evolution.
Mutation is a tale of constant improvement.
A secular myth of happy endings.
The real answers given at Sinai are completely different.
Real Judaism tells us from the first that there are no happy endings guaranteed, only the satisfaction from doing the right thing.
It is the task that is the central backbone to life not your success or any outcome.
But most atheists will never know this and anyway their mind-set has been cast.
We are left with our Lear-like raging at the storm as we blindly stagger across the stage, primed with unrealistic expectations, the failures of our subconscious script and the sight of society’s hypocritical top dogs.
And we are not only Lear but also the Fool.
Fashionable Morality
So, to whom can the atheist turn for his morality?
He cannot acknowledge religion and so he must plum for all ‘right-minded men’ of whom he is a prime example.
My real problem is that most right-minded men seem to find it perfectly moral to do atrocious things to those who do not share their views.
Right-minded cannibals regarded not eating their enemies as immoral.
When converted to Christianity, they have been found secretly to continue this for generations because they cannot lower themselves to the perverted morality of not having that last bite.
All right-minded members of some tribes regard allowing an imperfect child to live as incredibly immoral.
Right-minded Swiss regard euthanasia as extremely moral.
Right-minded secularists regard disallowing abortion as heinously immoral.
Thus morality runs breathlessly after fashion and acceptability.
As we have said, this week ‘Four feet good, two feet bad’ and next week ‘Four feet good, two feet better.’
Indeed, the worst consequence of evolution is the ultimate justification of any behaviour – provided ‘we’ decide its limits.
Almost every assassin believes he is saving humanity.
Every atheist is also certain that he is saving the world – from religion.
He knows that he has inspected every religion and found none credible.
Yet, he cannot accept that are no moral absolutes, even in a world in which men are the gods.
So some system must be created.
But doing as best we can often ends up in removing or abandoning those who threaten our freedoms.
Examples of Societal Compromises
For example, we may not yet annihilate all invalids and misfits and we shudder at eugenics.
But try this for size.
Even as we smile at them, we compromise up to 60% of our children.
Those of divorced couples.
Our society recommends divorce as the road to the individual’s fulfilment.
What if it were not a fashion, and personal ‘happiness’ were replaced by personal self-control and consideration for others?
Would the majority of divorces simply perhaps not be necessary?
But no. I dare go no further.
Most of you regard the previous paragraph as immoral and an affront to freedom, especially that of women.
Immediate divorce should be a right.
And please note that the tractate in the Talmud dealing with divorce comes before that dealing with marriage.
It is a long and complex one because when absolutely necessary, the woman’s rights must be guarded.
It is obviously unintelligent to choose a morality dictated by evolution.
We need to move one step back from any fashionable ‘morality’ and to examine its source – if we wish to accept or dismiss it as an ultimate model.
The Flaw in the Argument
At the end of this book we discuss the two opposite conclusions that one must draw in cold logic from the atheist’s position and that of the learned Jew.
However, the atheist deserves a little more attention in this because much time is spent examining the philosophy and morality of religions whilst the atheists are not credited with any depth of thought.
So what of the atheist? What is his deeper moral philosophy?
Science says of itself that it cannot provide all the answers.
It is faced with the implacable inconstant constants conundrum and the inexplicability of existence.
But the atheist must ignore firmly the general debate about something or ‘something’ or ‘Something’ running the universe.
The atheist must close his eyes to the greatest minds’ conclusions.
They all agree that the complete mystery of our existence – a fourfold inexplicability – and the unfathomable complexity of the universe absolutely imply a ‘something’ which every intelligent, logical and honest person must recognised – even if staunchly atheist – Dirac, Penrose, Einstein, Schrodinger, Collins, Planck, Heisenberg, Hubble, Hawking etc. etc.
Now, these men of course do not speak of Intelligent Design and utterly reject any type of god or traditional answer.
However, the void they need to fill spells danger to the atheist.
So he needs a fuller creed than a mere negativity.
Atheism’s Moral Constructs
First, obviously, there is no imperative to explain this ‘nothing – something’ conundrum as such because atheism itself is simply a denial of any religion.
It does not purport to have any other philosophy or provide answers.
However, atheists are decent, intelligent, logical and honest.
Thus they can shrink away from explaining cosmic problems such as ‘something’ but they feel they should provide a moral morality.
They do indeed construct this for themselves and a strong concept of good and evil.
This, as previously, is usually ‘doing good’ while not ‘being good’ – a brand of libertarian but altruistic liberalism.
They seem unwilling to remain in the jungle – even if atheism and evolution insist that this is where mankind really is.
They genuinely want at least a superior, kind jungle.
But they always fail.
Man has never created a permanent set of values.
Not one civilization ended up civilized.
And this is the ultimate consequence of evolution and mutation – an empty and contradictory amoral code.
The elite justifies its morality in a purposeless universe.
Now go and make the best of that.
Yes, we are mathematically impossible – but you can still try to grab as much fun as possible.
Atheists need Mother Mutation
But, as we know, obviously all this is based upon that central pillar.
Now despite the ‘something’ problem, there is no suggestion of any Creator because we can otherwise explain away the miraculous complexity of life through mutation.
Without this, the atheist has struggled with the question he has been asked for 3000 years – ‘The order, unfathomable complexity and fine tuning of the world makes your explanation of it happening by pure chance less reasonable than any religion.
We have not witnessed the supernatural in person, but we do see it in the supernaturally perfect universe around us.’
Then St Darwin did descend and gave unto them a god – Immaculate Mutation.
This at last provided the atheist with a clear answer.
Yes, of course, mutation is not a sine qua non but it endowed atheism with a weapon.
This is partially illogical in that mutation explains only how the miraculous universe ‘developed’.
It says nothing about its original appearance.
But we need not worry about that because the concept of some miniscule bit of universe or life suddenly appearing is actually quite acceptable once we have been fooled into believing evolution and mutation.
So, logic apart, mutation can replace creation and explain our ‘supernaturally natural’ world.
This is why atheists must believe in the unproven suppositions that uphold the sweet Mother Church of Immaculate Mutation.
They must be able to call mutation a ‘fact’.
They must have absolute faith in this world of imaginative guesses.
To be fair, Darwin himself, with rare self-restraint and wisdom, had nothing to say about the initiation of this world or life – just its development.
He was, some insist, a decent Christian.
This must be nonsense because no decent Christian could have written the despicable ‘Descent’.
Indeed, neither could a decent atheist nor a decent baboon.
Even Atheists Need a Purpose
Atheists are strangely sentimental about any ‘purpose’ or ‘moral imperative’.
Really, for them, the world’s initial singularity was a black day for most creatures.
We all live in a Survival of the Brutal, agony-ridden jungle of hopelessness.
There is no reason, no purpose, no hope, no good nor evil – no morality except that which we invent to flatter ourselves.
But being humans, atheists need to keep on concocting new systems.
All, but all, have failed.
Atheism teaches that our isle is full of noises, but they are meaningless.
We are brutish moon-calves like Caliban, and it just happened that, some of us, bored of hunter-gathering, became aware of a need for something more – distractions, intellectualism, religion, a purpose, origami.
For me this is utterly shallow and illogical.
Enjoy your selfish gene!
If there is no Creator then there is no moral imperative.
I suggested above that the backwash of centuries of Abrahamic religions, post-Christian public schooling, political rectitude, Wokeism and other baggage, as we have discussed, has created a woolly sense of right and wrong – to be stretched and twisted by each generation.
But purely logically, a Darwinist atheist should live on the basis of ‘dog-eat-dog’, only regulated by ensuring that my selfish amorality does not rebound on me.
Why on earth have any morality?
It is ridiculous unless the atheists believed Christianity if not in Christianity.
Beyond that absolutely necessary for personal survival you must not be moral.
Eat those neighbours whom you do not need for your survival.
You have been fooled by your world into having false, non-survival instincts.
This is the dichotomy of the post-Judaism Jew.
This is that sense of emptiness and lack of purpose.
Leave a Reply