Evolutionists have to evolve, obviously. Therefore, they toyed with the idea of rapid mutation.
They change slowly from wildly imaginative to stubborn to desperate faithheads.
Since mutation just does not make any sense, they had to invent new ways of explaining away the obvious.
They had to start inventing more and more ridiculous myths.
If this sad example of man’s self-delusion was not true and taken very seriously, it would be hilarious.
Mutationalists take innocent lizards, fish, birds, flies – in fact anything with a higher I.Q. than themselves – and invent entirely bizarre tales to spin about them.
The Rapid Mutation Myth Founded
Since mutation has never had time to occur – now that radiometric dating has disintegrated Darwin’s imaginary endless eons over which it could lazily happen, how could they support the entire nonsense?
Easy! They invented rapid mutation.
That’s right.
Deer to whale in a blink of a blind eye.
Consider the ‘Lizards of Pod Mrcaru’ experiment.
No, this is not a sequel to a Harry Potter book or even an offshoot from Tolkein et al.
Mutationists Desperately Needed Rapid Mutation
Mutationists desperately needed rapid mutation or they were sunk and these lizards were claimed to have exhibited rapid mutation.
The lizards themselves emphatically disagreed but they did not have the book rights, nor under European legislation, any Human Rights.
After all, it was correctly argued, they were lizards not evolutionists.
We meet this again and again with finches, fruit flies, mice, moths, guppies, whales, bacteria.
Each has proved our mantras and that mutation is a myth and in every single case, reversible adaptation.
Yet each is blindly used to ‘prove’ mutation.
But let us cross-examine these late, badly-used lizards and lay to rest the myth of ‘rapid’ mutation.
Rapid Mutation #1: Italian Wall Lizards Podarcis Sicula
Italian wall lizards, Podarcis sicula, were moved from one island to another in an experiment.
The first island was barren.
The lizards survived there by eating mainly insects.
This was pretty intelligent of them because there was very little vegetation – or even pizza.
But extremely importantly, they did eat a small quantity of vegetation when they could find it.
In contrast, the second island had plenty of vegetation (but still no pizza.)
You can guess the rest of the yarn.
In less than 40 years, those lizards moved to the second island developed features which assisted in the eating and digestion of vegetation.
They had different, stronger jaws – all the better for crunching fibrous plants with – and a slight adaptation in their guts – nominal cecal valves – all the better for digesting fibrous plants with.
Repeat the Mantras
And then?
Repeat the mantras – ‘There has never been a single example of beneficial mutation found’ and then answer the question.
Mutation is a myth.
All of its claims are better explained by completely non-Darwinian, common-sense causes – all organisms have always had the innate ability to adapt and adapt back – within strict boundaries.
This is adaptation, not mutation!
Obviously, these lizards had no need of such features on their first island.
But, most significantly, they did eat some vegetation on that first island.
Thus, we are certain that their template allowed for vegetation-consuming features.
These simply developed and adapted with their new diet and environment within their physiological template.
The better vege chompers were the stronger and had more kids.
Note the word – ‘adapted’.
Note the absence of the word – ‘mutated’.
Difficult stuff this.
Proofs That These Lizards Did Not Mutate
Proof 1 – they remained exactly the same species – DNA proves this.
Then comes Proof 2 – when returned to the first island, they interbred with their old flames from back home on the first island.
Proof 3 – as above – their template allowed for vegetation-consuming features.
They used to chomp veggies back home!
Proof 4 – they lost these ‘mutated’ features as soon as they were plonked back on the first island.
Proof 5 – we have no knowledge of the original 5 pairs of lizards transplanted.
The population which descended from them certainly will have passed down their idiosyncratic features.
These will have been greatly exaggerated through inbreeding.
Perhaps two or three of the progenitors had bigger jaws and funny guts (sorry – nominal cecal valves).
Rapid Mutation #2: Insight from the Northern Elephant Seal
As an insight into this, and as a comparison and parallel tale, consider the not inconsiderable Northern Elephant seal.
It was on the verge of extinction from the greed of the greatest scourge ever to hit planet Earth – blubber hungry Homo Sapiens Avarus.
All the world’s surviving stock disappeared except for 20 survivors on one Mexican island about 100 years ago.
The Mexicans extremely sensibly simply shot poachers.
All our elephant seals in the Northern hemisphere are their descendants and have therefore converging DNA and accentuated idiosyncrasies.
This would be greatly exaggerated with only five original pairs of lizards.
Proof 6 – Further, the whole lizards’ bigger jaw story seems strange – as many slim-jawed species of lizards eat only vegetation without mutating into mini-Tyrannosauri Regi.
How come the original population of the second island did not have super jaws?
A Slightly Different Type of Lizard
Proof 7 – A slightly different type of lizard already living on the second island did not, as above, have these ‘new’ features.
This leads us to another question.
These guys, the original inhabitants, had been there for ever and a day.
They had been chomping vegetation for ever and a day.
Why had they not developed the jaws and guts of the ‘mutating’ interlopers?
Answer – simple.
Their template did not have such features scripted.
So they did not develop them.
And to illustrate this particularly painfully, the old population of the second island were eliminated by the new population with the adaptive template.
Let us dissect this extremely carefully.
The second island’s origin population of lizards – who had never adapted – were exterminated by the new-comers who did adapt.
In other words, as is so often true, this example absolutely disproves mutation.
Why did the second island’s indigenous population not mutate.
They had a billion years so to do – or at least much longer than 40 years.
The cost of not adapting was annihilation.
Surely, they had every reason to adapt.
They could not – so they did not.
Dead lizards do tell tales.
Again, over-eager, bright-eyed faith-head mutationists have cooked their own goose – or lizard – and taken mutation down with them.
Rapid Mutation #3: The Extinct Palau People
A parallel example is that of the extinct Palau People.
These pygmy inhabitants of a west-Pacific island group have been the subject of much speculation ranging from the insane to the hilarious.
A cave of fossilised bones on Palau has borne a mass of theories of yet more ‘hobbits’ – Bilbo’s relatives some of whom also apparently inhabited Flores, an Indonesian island.
The Palau were said to prove all things that the bright and beautiful have pronounced upon in relation to rapid mutation.
The scientists muttered in awed whispers the tantalising probability that they had ‘mutated’ in just a century or so into very, very short, massively-built, long-toothed pre-humans from moderately short massively-built, long-toothed pre-humans.
They changed certain attributes in nano-seconds – in mutational time – rather parallel to the lizards.
So, we find ‘incredibly’ rapid mutation being used to support the theory of mutation.
Palauan Adaptation: Not Mutation
However later studies (no, not by the Baggins family) decided this was a load of nonsense.
The Palau were simply a group that either were normal pygmies but perhaps a little smaller in height, or had adapted – note the word – adapted to their island or had a large number of shorter but dominant males amongst them.
But they were after all small, long dead and good material for a yarn – so no one actually stated that it is patently not ‘rapid’ mutation.
And, more importantly, although abandoned on their island, they again failed to show any purported mutation over millions of years, a fact unsurprisingly ignored.
The experts of course would answer that they had reached a degree of perfection making mutation redundant.
This applies to mutationalists – they cannot change anything about themselves or their opinions.
Unfortunately they do not all live on an isolated island.
We should collect to pay for a migration to Neverland.
Naturally the demise of the hobbit people of Palau is carefully ignored.
That they are another piece of disproven, fantastic speculation is also amazingly not mentioned.
Again, whatever the consequences or contradictions, mutation must be right.
Leave a Reply