What? Darwin’s Nazi quotations? If most evolutionists had read Darwin’s gift to humanity – his last book – ‘The Decent of Man’ – they would certainly have had to think twice about their infallible saint.
Evolution starts from a need to justify elitism.
Without evolution fascist, Nazi elitism is simply evil.
With the absolute proof that evolution claims, they become understandable even justifiable,
You must not believe this, so this blog is full of unadulterated, long quotations from Darwin’s Nazi tract.
Darwin actually coldly contemplates allowing the weak to die – as happens ‘with savages’.
He writes, as below, rather ambiguously – ‘if we were intentionally to neglect the weak and helpless, it could only be for a contingent benefit’ – the benefit being – the purification of our race.
Jawohl!
What sort of mind can actually write this down, long-hand?
We soon discover.
Forgive the lengthy quotes – but I do not wish to be accused of [rotten] cherry-picking or misrepresenting such a noble spirit.
Darwin’s Nazi Quotations #1: The Case For Eugenics
‘With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. … Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind.
No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man.’
And the final sentence is quite astonishing:
‘It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed’
Are we not stupid, through care wrongly directed, to allow the degeneration of a domestic race?
Surely hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed’?
The worst animals are you and all you know who are not the wealthiest or top-pedigree Caucasian elite.
Now you know why I call this despicable tract – The Descent of Darwin.
Yes, your cuddly, white-bearded Santa figure – who permits every type of animalistic behavior because we all come from animals, wrote this and far worse.
His Xmas gift of promiscuity and publicly-condoned libertarianism comes at a cost.
But do not worry, only the weak and vulnerable will have to pay.
You and the white elite can carry on dancing.
Darwin Doubles Down on His Ideas
Darwin doubles down on his evil, vicious little ideas.
He is not very bright as we all know.
He writes hopelessly and often incomprehensibly and stole most of the jumbled ideas he attempts to put over.
But he says what we all want to hear and therefore lit up the world.
We are the elite jungle animals and we rule and can get away with anything.
There is no morality except survival and that which some inexplicable kind-heartedness imposes on us.
He adds that we are impelled by our ‘superior elite natures’ to help the sick and weak.
This is extremely irregular but somehow – illogically – to be true Darwinians and kill off the weak or let them die – would be a certain and great present evil.
What an incredible hypocrite!
Darwin’s Reason For Morality
Being kind is seen as necessary, quite astonishingly, not because helping others is the right thing to do, nor from any moral imperative.
It is right because must mark ourselves out as moral animals.
This is for our own selfish elitist reasons.
We must do ‘the right thing’ to prevent the deterioration in the noblest part of our nature.
That deterioration is the only certain and great evil, not heartless indifference to suffering.
No, that would be fine.
Let them suffer – but as that may diminish our status we should not do this.
To remain superior in spirit we are forced to behave kindly and altruistically.
The reason for morality is only our own continued elitist status.
Nowhere does he suggest that those receiving our largesse are deserving or even justify our noble efforts.
That is irrelevant.
Only our superior race’s benefit is worthy of note.
So if Charlie’s ghastly specter were suddenly to return to rule over us about 6 billion humans would be exterminated leaving just enough to serve the elite – oh, sorry – unless he thought this would cause the deterioration in the noblest part of his nature.
The Reason For Our Racial Superiority
This noble behaviour proves and maintains our racial superiority.
Literally noblesse oblige writ large.
There is no hint of compassion, or that alleviating suffering or helping the weak is a moral ‘good’ in itself for their sakes.
There is no sympathy with those we condescend to help.
The only excuse for helping the weak is protecting the noblest part of our nature.
Darwin’s Nazi Quotations #2: Our Superior Noblesse
Read the actual words of your great, compassionate, so noble ideological god:
“The aid which we feel impelled to give to the helpless is mainly an incidental result of the instinct of sympathy, which was originally acquired as part of the social instincts, but subsequently rendered, in the manner previously indicated, more tender and more widely diffused.”
Nor could we check our sympathy, if so urged by hard reason, without the deterioration in the noblest part of our nature.
And he continues, digging ever deeper:
Hence we must bear without complaining the undoubtedly bad effects of the weak surviving and propagating their kind; but there appears to be at least one check in steady action, namely the weaker and inferior members of society not marrying so freely as the sound; and this check might be indefinitely increased, though this is more to be hoped for than expected, by the weak in body or mind refraining from marriage.”
Yes, you read that correctly.
There it is – German eugenics – ‘the weak in body or mind refraining from marriage’ this being ‘one check in steady action’ and ‘to be hoped for’, ‘this check might be indefinitely increased’.
Die Reinigung – cleansing – of the Caucasian race.
Yes, Saint Darwin wrote that and published it and believed it.
The Attitudes of Victorian Britain
I must emphasize powerfully that this was not the typical attitude of ‘that time’.
This ogre has no excuse.
This was 1870.
The later Victorians were entirely different from the educated classes of even 1800s.
Britain’s active role in stopping slave ships and her having a conspicuously powerful woman as ruler, combined with the flood of egalitarian and conscientious socially-conscious literature from 1780 – 1870 caused a quiet but almost complete revolution in attitudes.
These were already practically cemented as the middle and late Victorians’ societal mores.
Nobody, but nobody, used these terms in public – whatever his private views were.
Malthus And Eugenics
Malthus had proposed his eugenic program only for the sake of the indigenous.
He saw that controlling population growth would improve the economic condition of the poor.
That is all.
He absolutely did not even hint at taking active steps to force this on people.
He was no proto-Nazi.
Further, his theory, first published on 1798, had been heavily criticised well before Victoria took the throne in 1837.
His controls were presented as the only way of relieving mass starvation and the destruction of society.
That was the only motive – a wider good for that same population.
There was no hint of using forced eugenics simply to preserve the elite and eliminate the inadequate.
It took Darwin’s evil little mind to use this idea as a suggested means of cleansing his race and establishing his supreme elite.
Egalitarian Writings and Changing Attitudes
Egalitarian writings from throughout Europe and reading material from Austen to Dickens’ works had infiltrated themselves into the public psyche.
The world that the latter painted promoted a saccharine, all-embracing love and acceptance of the lowest in society – the victims of the heartless elite.
But Dickens was taken extremely seriously by his readers.
Scrooge repented.
Gradgrind is reviled.
The wealthy were lampooned as evil, selfish sociopaths.
Poverty became a terrible affliction rather than a sign of indolence and depravity.
Similarly, the tide was turning even for women who were still treated appallingly.
Educated people simply did not speak as they had done in the 1830s.
The virtues they extoled were increasingly liberal and proto-socialist.
Only Darwin Could Dream to Write Like Darwin
Marx published Das Kapital in 1867 and had settled permanently in London twenty years earlier because of the prevalent philosophical climate there.
Of course, every racialist and evil opinion was still embedded at every level.
However, who, in 1871, could dream of writing like Darwin?
Only the troll, Darwin.
Again, the faithful shake with indignation at such accusations – even based on the supremacist’s own verbatim writings.
They prostrate before him and sacrifice their credibility by quoting gallons of his prose which actually proves the condemnation conclusively.
Even his anti-slavery, ‘egalitarian’ verbosity amounts to little.
He was plainly racist.
Darwin’s Nazi Quotations #3: Kind Feelings For The Negro
His condescending surprise that ‘the negro’ actually might not be so repellent is scarcely impressive:
‘It is impossible to see a negro and not feel kindly towards him; such cheerful, open, honest expressions and such fine muscular bodies. I never saw any of the diminutive Portuguese, with their murderous countenances, without almost wishing for Brazil to follow the example of Haiti; and, considering the enormous healthy-looking black population … ’
He certainly did think that humans were ranged from most superior to most inferior and the question was only how this may be defined.
‘Savages’, but inconsistently not all men, are comparable to ‘distinct species of monkeys’.
Monkeys With Different Cries
‘He … can hardly fail to be deeply impressed with the close similarity between the men of all races in tastes, dispositions and habits. This is shown by the pleasure which they all take in dancing, rude music, acting, painting, tattooing, and otherwise decorating themselves; in their mutual comprehension of gesture-language, by the same expression in their features, and by the same inarticulate cries, when excited by the same emotions. This similarity, or rather identity, is striking, when contrasted with the different expressions and cries made by distinct species of monkeys.’
We note that he speaks of savages and not the chaps with whom he dallied away his misspent youth.
Now this, of course, is typically unintelligent and illogical.
But again our Charlie was not particularly bright.
Imaginative – yes; supremely over-confident – by birth-right; wealthy – you bet; privileged – a British public school dandy; circumlocutious – woefully; but brilliant – by no means.
Darwin is as obviously wrong as are all elitists who seize on evolution and atheism to justify their position and see in Mother Nature only that which supported their benighted views.
Scratch an upper class evolutionist and you will find – not blue blood but elitist self-justification.
Darwin on Mental Powers and Victorian Values
In ‘Comparison of the mental powers of man and the lower animals’ – Chapter 4 of ‘The Descent’ – appears one of the very few, apparently commendable passages – constantly quoted by the Darwin worshippers to exonerate their god.
It turns out to be in context nothing more than contradictory, diluted Victorian political rectitude.
‘But as love, sympathy and self-command become strengthened by habit, and as the power of reasoning becomes clearer, so that man can value justly the judgments of his fellows, he will feel himself impelled, apart from any transitory pleasure or pain, to certain lines of conduct.’
Ah, those fine lads from my school rowing team, they exhibit such great qualities.
‘He might then declare—not that any barbarian or uncultivated man could thus think—I am the supreme judge of my own conduct, and in the words of Kant, I will not in my own person violate the dignity of humanity.’
We see here that even when Darwin gushes virtuous Victorian values he nonetheless ignores the good they do.
He justifies them merely by their effect on the internal flowering of his own cultivated elite.
Darwin And The Law of Honor
In his condescending, self-congratulatory conviction in his clade’s superiority, earlier he actually talks of a ‘Law of Honor’.
Only the fine hero of the hour, the white man, the British upper-class public school champion, can achieve this however.
The jolly good chaps will be jolly fine fellows, don’t you know.
I will not in my own person violate the dignity of humanity because I am superior, proven by that aside not that any barbarian or uncultivated man could thus think.
Yes, he wrote that.
You have to attend a well-heeled, well-oiled public school for the British upper classes or you cannot ever be civilised.
The stench of this attitude of course still lingers.
Upper Class Attitudes Unchanged
Just listen in to the opinions of the Junior and Senior Common rooms of any Oxbridge college – when only public school chums are present.
If ‘toads’ (non-public school creatures) are there, then there is usually silence – nowadays.
50 years ago I well remember hearing the truth from the mouths of those who presumably are today’s retiring leaders.
I was of course a barely tolerated Jewboy.
Darwin is simply playing political rectitude, vicariously, for the sake of his own self-importance.
There is no moral imperative but merely an observation that ultimately our self-respect and education leads us to this.
We are too superior to do otherwise.
Darwin’s Nazi Quotations #4: Spreading Sympathy To Lower Races
Strangely, the following is actually used to show what a godly, messianic figure he really was.
Here is the gentle, kindly god of all modern gods speaking of his ideal of the fellowship of man – Darwin’s commonwealth.
This is meant to prove his love of all mankind.
But note that this is cold observation, not a recommended process:
‘As man advances in civilization, and small tribes are united into larger communities, the simplest reason would tell each individual that he ought to extend his social instincts and sympathies to all the members of the same nation, though personally unknown to him. This point being once reached, there is only an artificial barrier to prevent his sympathies extending to the men of all nations and races.’
It is merely the inevitable result of an overflow of truly useful altruism ‘to the same nation’ – ‘that he ought to extend’ into new, less useful areas – ‘men of all nations’ – ‘and races’.
‘Sympathy beyond the confines of man, that is, humanity to the lower animals, seems to be one of the latest moral acquisitions. It is apparently unfelt by savages, except towards their pets … This virtue, one of the noblest with which man is endowed, seems to arise incidentally from our sympathies becoming more tender and more widely diffused, until they are extended to all sentient beings. As soon as this virtue is honored and practiced by some few men, it spreads through instruction and example to the young, and eventually becomes incorporated in public opinion.’
Reaching The Zenith Of Nobility
So we learn from kindness to animals – ‘one of the noblest’ virtues – that we have reached a zenith in allowing this to be ‘extended to all sentient beings.’
We have proven earlier that these exclude women, non-whites and ‘lower vicious savages’.
Further, it is simply nonsense.
Darwin ate stuck pig and flesh tortured to death.
What of hunting as a sport?
Indeed, this is pain ‘unfelt by savages’.
Note carefully that sympathy to all sentient beings is one of the noblest virtues but ‘seems to arise incidentally from our sympathies becoming more tender and more widely diffused’.
And ‘the simplest reason would tell each individual’ to start this process.
Again, it is over-extended tribal altruism.
It may be noble to be nice to fox hounds but Charlie is not recommending it to humans.
He is simply observing how morality might progress as a human trait.
Extending Nobility To Untermenschen
And tellingly, discussing its transmission, he recounts it even ‘extending to men of all races, to the imbecile, maimed, and other useless members of society, and finally to the lower animals’.
The very thought!!
Ultimately, it is his own elite’s fullest development that has endowed it with its ‘disinterested love for all living creatures’.
Again, the superior race’s Victorian compassion and assistance to the indigent is valuable only to perfect our nobility.
Who cares about those we graciously help?
So, note, we do not see Darwin, the ultimate honest moral being, objectively observing mankind’s development.
He is interpreting it in his own cheap elitist terms.
He is not torn between his British decency and his evolutionary imperatives.
Darwin is not torn at all.
He has revealed his evil soul.
Darwin’s True Nature Exposed
This kindly old man wrote ‘and this check (enforced celibacy) might be indefinitely increased, (how – enforced sterilisation?) though this is more to be hoped for than expected…’
Remember, seventy years after Malthus – and not to save mankind for starvation but only to purify the Caucasian human race.
In other words, the lower, inferior humans are equal to stock animals, to be bred as required.
The really compromised and useless must not breed.
The rest must breed only as the Ubermenschen dictate.
The above quotes are verbatim and not taken out of context, and this is why, as mentioned, I made them rather lengthy.
Go and read The Descent.
Again, these were not – not – commonly held views by his peers.
They had evolved.
He had not.
Darwin’s Original Contribution Was Plagiarism
And, to top it all, the amazing Charlie Darwin’s great original contribution to mankind was open, blatant plagiarism.
All he did was invent suppositions as to how nature fitted in with others’ ideas about evolution. All that Charlie boy did was use his inherited wealth to travel and observe.
His expensive education taught him to write – albeit badly and illogically – and his elitist background bestowed his uncritical over-confidence which allowed him to do so.
His obduracy made him blind to the change in attitudes and his familial bulldog tenacity and energy gave him the determination to disseminate his own supremacist doctrine.
Darwin’s Nazi Quotations #5: Misogyny At Its Best
Feminism had certainly not truly appeared but the attitude to and acceptance of women had diametrically changed between 1800 and 1870.
They were generally still a slave caste – but exceptions were allowed even in the middle-classes.
Men could no longer dismiss those women with attitude, as it were.
Mary Wollstonecraft’s influential writings were in the 1790s, by the 1840s Caroline Norton had achieved mothers’ custody over their children and by 1870 the role of and attitude to women were just beginning to change, in parallel with the attitudes to slaves.
Yes, it took another 150 years to begin truly perhaps to alter society.
White men had a lot to lose.
But what was male chauvinist Charlie writing in that very era?
Well, I hope the quotes herein do not start a campaign to exhume him and put his remains in a compost heap.
I fear they just might.
Darwin’s Fear of Strong-Willed Ladies
He whimsically feared a liaison between his brother, Erasmus, and one Harriet Martineau, a famously strong-willed young lady who loudly and fearlessly championed women’s rights, abolition, the free-market and other controversial and modern ideas.
Martineau had toured America, and was bursting with the new Married Women’s Property Act proposals.
Darwin wrote these words to his sister, Caroline:
Erasmus is just returned from driving out Miss Martineau. — Our only protection from so admirable a sister-in-law is in her working him too hard.
He begins to perceive, (to use his own expression) he shall be not much better than her “n**r”.— Imagine poor Erasmus a n**r to so philosophical & energetic a lady.— How pale & woe begone he will look.— She already takes him to task about his idleness— She is going some day to explain to him her notions about marriage— Perfect equality of rights is part of her doctrine.
I much doubt whether it will be equality in practice.
Praying For The Lesser Races
We must pray for our poor “n****r”.
Yes, he is writing a private letter.
He was being whimsical.
Yes, he was quoting his brother’s use of the ‘n’ word, but his sense of humor rejoices in the ridiculous comparison of Erasmus with a non-white slave.
There seems no sympathy there.
Yes, he felt sorry for the individual slaves but not because of a revulsion at their degradation and use as forced free labour.
Had it been done without cruelty, he would have thoroughly approved.
His anti-slavery is simply a family stance.
In parallel, he is against any rights for women, is horrified by Martineau and obviously feared women unless they were subservient, sock-darning, broody hens.
A Chauvinist Against The Tide of Time
This is in the 1830s, when Jane Austen’s novels were read throughout the land and women were at last beginning to win some of their battles.
Yet, his worshippers have, and always will have, a thousand answers and excuses for their god.
None of these would have been accepted by Darwin’s contemporaries.
But, let us be honest, he was not ‘just joking … perhaps in bad taste’.
Remember, as we have read, the qualities of Queen Victoria and her half of humanity ‘are characteristic of the lower races, and are therefore of a past and lower state of civilization’ and ‘the average of mental power in man must be above that of women’ … ‘in whatever he takes up … whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands.’
Darwin’s Nazi Quotes Inspire Herrenrasse und Untermenschen
All this puts his mind and ideas in true context and shows conclusively why the Germans – the Herrenrasse – master race – used Darwin as an intellectual prop in their extermination of the Untermenschen – lower races – a fact acknowledged even by the Oxford English Dictionary.
Race:
…Ideas of supposed racial superiority and social Darwinism reached their culmination in Nazi ideology of the 1930s and gave pseudoscientific justification to policies and attitudes of discrimination, exploitation, slavery, and extermination…
If the Descent were as widely known as the Origin Darwin would be dismissed as a rabid racist, anti-feminist and elitist – which of course he was.
Nobody mentions this little pot of poison today – although it was Darwin’s seminal work on evolution.
This was his legacy to us.
His masterpiece.
This was his ‘Tristan und Isolde’.
Same Philosophy Behind All Of Darwin’s Work
‘The Descent’ is the philosophy behind ‘The Origin’.
No one will believe this because I am libelling Santa Darwin who has brought such wonderful gifts and liberated modern man to be proudly able to behave like an animal, so I shall have to repeat this again.
‘The Descent’ really is the philosophy behind ‘The Origin’.
Now, having a god as questionable as Darwin, merely means one divorces the message from the man.
It certainly does not suggest that you share or condone even one of his political opinions.
But I find the contrast between the world’s take on Darwin and the bare facts rather jarring.
I could not worship a god whose quasi-intellectual stolen ideas and fantasies have so obviously grown out of a sewer.
Ideas are built upon a human’s actual being.
If he is repugnant in his opinions, then might I not harbour some reservations about the ideas he promotes if they reflect these?
Now we can fully understand the full title of that which we all refer to so glibly as ‘The Origin’.
It is horrifically illuminating.
The Descent at the end of Darwin’s cosy, moneyed, privileged life fully exposes his soul (if I may use that word).
But we should have suspected something was amiss because his earlier, most famous work on which so much of our morality is based is not actually called ‘On the Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection.’
Please Judge The Author By The Title
Read again carefully its full title –
‘On the Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life.’
Yes, read that little insignificant, never quoted last bit again: ‘the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life.’
‘Favored races’ does not mean the Grand National or Triple Crown.
Nor, as the faithful idol-worshippers tearfully insist, did ‘race’ mean or imply anything different in 1859 from today.
That is a piece of dishonest faith-head fantasy.
Race Means Race!
Charlie meant ‘race’ as in ‘race’.
Yes, we all know that it can be used to describe a distinct population within a species of animal.
Yes, it can also be used to describe a ‘type’ of cabbage or nematode.
But all the normal uses in the Complete Oxford Dictionary, quoted earlier, refer specifically or include man:
‘race’
Scientifically it is accepted as obvious that there are subdivisions of the human species, but it is also clear that genetic variation between individuals of the same race can be as great as that between members of different races.’
So, all those apologists for sweet, kind, Onkel Karl Darwin should perhaps get their facts right.
Mind you, that is a ridiculous statement.
If they could do that they would not believe in evolution.
Further, remember, this model for humanity writes like a poor imitation of a bad 18th century hack.
Charlie The Bad Writer
George Eliot (an acquaintance) said ‘The Origin’ was ‘ill-written’.
T. H. Huxley is quoted as saying that ‘nothing entertains me more than to hear people call it easy reading… Exposition …was not Darwin’s forte – and his English is sometimes wonderful.’
That ‘wonderful’ is whimsical and means puzzling and incongruous.
An entire book on this subject, predictably glorifying this virtuous, humble, compassionate giant of humanity, somehow concludes that he was a great writer.
I cannot, I am afraid agree, in any way.
It is hard to believe that Macaulay, Carlyle, the Brontës, Dickens, Eliot, Hardy, Conan Doyle, Wilde and Wells were contemporaries of or buttress this wretched mind.
It is astonishing that any decent human can admire Darwin or waste a moment on his illogical and never, ever substantiated stolen ideas.
So we can understand idol worship and must sympathise with all men of every faith.
No Darwinist dare criticize those who hold to blind, pure, illogical faith.
Leave a Reply