
The mathematical Laws of Probability utterly destroy mutation. Probability simply disproves evolution could ever occur in a reasonable timeframe.
It is universally accepted as unassailable, indisputable, incontrovertible and unquestionable.
And this is all well before we even start any of the usual bombardment with skulls, jaw bones, E. coli, whales and other physical evidence whatsoever.
In summary, a single cell mutating into the lump of 30 – 40 trillion cells that you comprise – has been mathematically proven to be impossible in a trillion billion years – never mind in a mere 4 billion years – the secular age for life.
Secular mathematicians proved long ago that it is a billion times more likely that you will find the leprechauns’ hoard of gold tomorrow than that you exist because of mutation.
In fact, it is far more likely that you are a leprechaun – even if you are Jewish.
Irish Catholic readers have a 0.0000000000001% greater chance, but why on earth are you reading this?
Two Things Emerge
Two things emerge: first, if you believe in evolution then indeed keep on looking for the little people and drinking draught Guinness (which is great!!).
Secondly, if, as is certain, you do not believe me, read on.
It really is astonishing. Nothing shocks me and I was shocked.
I did not know my task was so easy.
Probability Disproves Evolution and Mutation
Now we examine and use our claim that not one example of beneficial mutation has been found because it can never have happened.
Mutation is impossible.
Emphatically, math proves this incontrovertible fact.
Simple arithmetic can compute the number of the necessary mutations, repetitions, replications and failures.
We can work out the time this must have taken.
There never has been enough time. Science has proven that.
Utterly gutted by this simple fact, mutationists have mutated their message.
They have wriggled and squirmed and invented a new impossible fantasy – Rapid Mutation – and created a whole world of derisory smoke screens which we shall merrily blow away later.
Remember, random mutations must be combined with:
- Beneficial repetitions, not one of which has ever been discovered.
- In a successful consequential sequence.
- Increased at random or ‘guided by selection’.
- Within those mutated cells, groups of cells and individuals.
- Trillions of replications of that impossible 4 step process.
- The increased number of beneficial mutations in just that improved strain.
- The repetition – not of the reproduction of those individuals – but of the process of random chance and/or the survival of the fittest changing more and more features.
- The necessarily incredibly incremental and gradual continuation of the process.
The above are simply arithmetically impossible in terms of any probability.
You just ran out of time – by an immeasurable number of years.
Yes, it would take infinity – and that only if the first single step of a true beneficial mutation being possible is shown to be occurred – which it has not.
We are back to the infinite number of palaeontologists on an infinite number of typewriters producing the works of Darwin.
At least type writers can be shown to produce typescript.
However, again, not one cell has been shown to mutate beneficially and permanently.
Adaptation Not Mutation
Sure, many species have alternate genes that can ‘switch on’ or not as circumstances require.
Dark or light pigmentation is a common example.
Most creatures carry within them genes which can switch between lighter or darker hair colouring.
Species exhibit preferences for the dark generally.
However, if all those with dark colouring are eaten or all the lighter can hide or hunt more successfully, then the species becomes predominately light because the tendency to dark or light is hereditary.
The species adapts temporarily – and note that little word – adapts.
So, in truth, we rather have an infinite number of completely delusional palaeontologists speculating on an infinite number of completely non-functional type writers.
You’re not going to get even a sonnet out of that lot.
So now we know that even if we pretend that bacteria, diatoms or other micro-organisms indeed show mutation – not merely adaptation – the theory is still dead in the water or primeval soup.
It has suffered death by arithmetic.
Death By Radiometric Dating
And no evolutionist is willing to discuss this question in detail.
He will change the subject. He will not have an answer.
Mathematics was always a problem for evolutionism.
But things have recently got worse.
As long as Darwin could rely on vague, untold eons of billions of millions of years to allow for vague mutations miraculously to occur, he could avoid this obvious problem.
But now he cannot rely on immeasurable lengths of Deep Time.
For today there is yet another very large and very smelly elephant in the room right there next to the atheist-evolutionist and all his chums.
Every time you hear or see a palaeontologist, tell him to give a cube of sugar to the elephant – because they all just insist on ignoring him.
Perhaps the over-powering odoriferous nature of his presence embarrasses them.
Or perhaps just their new truth.
And this elephant is really their own discovery.
It is called radiometric dating.
Secularists glory in its accuracy – but it cruelly demolishes mutation, absolutely and finally.
Probability Disproves Evolution: 4 Billion Years Is Too Little
This is because it proves to the secularists that we are dealing with just a mere 4 billion years that they now claim for the initiation of life.
But this is not long enough even to begin mutation, were it to have begun.
That first primal squeak of a single cell palaeontologist – marking the beginnings of our alleged evolution – had to be immeasurable eons longer ago according to all evolutionists.
After a mere 4 billion years, you would not have got much past a slimy lump of cells – never mind a full grown academic.
There is no mathematical scheme that can encompass mutation.
The degree and number of changes are so many and the probability of each of them occurring is so infinitely minute that mutation would need a miracle far greater than any in any religion.
Even your fairy godmother could not do it.
Sorry, children. Nice dream but not in anyone’s real world.
I go through the sums below.
Again, we need a change which had a minute benefit for its owner so it could survive better.
This never-discovered type of beneficial micro-mutation had to be completely by chance.
Remember each mutation relied on chance sparked by an unknown and unprecedented process – one in an innumerable zillion.
Then that mutation had to be passed down by another chance one in a zillion chance.
And once impossibly inherited, it had to be beneficial enough for that strain to become more numerous.
Then another mutation sparked by an unknown and unprecedented process – one in an innumerable zillion – had to happen just to that strain – and no other.
What luck! That is a chance of a jillion.
This is getting silly.
Do I really have to explain this to intelligent people, especially as not one beneficial mutation has ever been found?
The Eye: A Clear Proof Against Mutation
For example, to mutate from a vaguely light-sensitive mutant molecular structure to an eye must mathematically take longer both than the time that the world has existed and that we have numbers to describe.
The eye is actually an excellent proof of how mutation and therefore evolution just could not have happened.
The first useless proto-light-sensitive cell happened by a chance mutation in one little wriggly thing. Then, in that particular wriggly thing’s own offspring.
First – we must suppose that that very proto-light sensitive cell was uselessly and by chance passed on. Then that the Son of Wriggle who had by chance inherited Dad’s useless cell, had a beneficial mutation in just that cell.
Now let’s say Daddy Wriggle has a mere million cells and Son of has a million: that is 1:1,000,000 multiplied by 1:1,000.000.
That is one million million.
Let us be kind and say that Dad had 100 offspring – who inherited, by magic, the mutated cell.
So the chances are increased to the absolutely decisive 1:1,000,000,000 – not exactly awesome.
The problem is compounded by the utter uselessness of even two proto-light sensitive cells – unattached to any nerves or rudimentary brain – even the sort of brain mutationists have.
Now get out your abacus and start working out the probability of a third useless eye cell mutating in that group.
If you glance in a mirror, you can count 90 million rod cells and 4.5 million cone cells in your eye. Never mind the rest of the miraculous orb.
Even if you mutated one beneficial cell in one thousand years (and impossibly passed it on), it would take you 94.5 billion years before you could wear contact lenses.
Waiting For An Eye To Pop In 80 Billion Years
The universe according to science [and Kabbalah] is about 13 to 15 billion years old.
We should be waiting for our glasses for another 80 billion years.
Opticians would all be bankrupt.
It is simply science fiction; fantasy.
Moreover, we have just touched on the minor point that you would need millions of nerve cells specially adapted to transmit the information about the hardly seen light and dark to the brain.
And, even if each of these different nerve cells had miraculously ‘happened’ (one to a million, million, million million chance approximately).
Now we need the appropriate brain cells to deal with all this data.
Even presuming that the enlightened creature having all this new baggage was able now to see that there was light or dark – how on earth would it know what to do?
If it ducked rather than ran – it would be gobbled up.
The next time, how would its surviving twin-brother know what to do?
If he ran rather than ducked – he would be gobbled up.
They would have been exterminated.
Life was tough out there in the earliest, life-giving broth.
It is simply science fiction; fantasy.
We All Love A Good Story
So why do all the serious people in the world believe in it and take it for granted as the ‘Law’ of Evolution.
Why do they love mocking the backward, loony religious folk?
Why do they not ask the platypus – a perfect refutation for evolution.
All right, enough of the rhetoric.
Now for the proof – hard mathematical proof.
Sorry, mutation is not improbable; it is impossible.
I admire the evolutionists’ faith, even if I cannot share it.
More importantly, even a drunk platypus could not share it.
This mathematical proof is in a separate blog not to be read ever by those whose love their cosy Uncle St Charlie world.
Leave a Reply